Moorland vegetation burning debates should avoid contextomy and anachronism: a comment on Davies et al. (2016)
نویسندگان
چکیده
& 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The accompanying reply can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0434. Moorland vegetation burning debates should avoid contextomy and anachronism: a comment on Davies et al. (2016)
منابع مشابه
The peatland vegetation burning debate: keep scientific critique in perspective. A response to Brown et al. and Douglas et al.
& 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The accompanying comments can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0432 and http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0433. The peatland vegetation b...
متن کاملThe peatland vegetation burning debate : keep scientific critique in perspective . A response to Brown
& 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The accompanying comments can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0432 and http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0433. The peatland vegetation b...
متن کاملSome Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملThe Co-Constitution of Health Systems and Innovation; Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review”
Lehoux et al provide a timely and relevant turn on the broad and ongoing discussion around the introduction of health technology and innovation. More specifically, the authors suggest a demand-driven approach to health innovation that starts from identifying challenges and demands at the health system level. In this commentary, I review a number of underlying implications of their study in rela...
متن کاملWhistleblowing: Don’t Encourage It, Prevent It; Comment on “Cultures of Silence And Cultures of Voice: The Role Of Whistleblowing in Healthcare Organisations”
In a recent article, Mannion and Davies argue that there are a multitude of ways in which organizations (such as the National Health Service [NHS]) can deal with wrongdoing or ethical problems, including the formation of policies that encourage and protect would-be whistleblowers. However, it is important to distinguish internal reporting about wrongdoing from whistleblowing proper, because the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 371 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016